The Orchestral Headphone Soundstage

The Soundstage in live recordings is usually flat and distant in high-end headphones. Well produced studio recordings, on the other hand, surround your head like a gigant musical gloria. I tend to forget to find out how a cd is recorded. Recently, I bought Arvo Pärt’s “Symphony 4″ and was, as usually, underwhelmed when I listened to an orchesteral work in in my headphones. Believe it or not, but this problem is not as conspicuous with a room-based audio equipment – even if is high end.

Music is traditionally something coming towards you, not something surrounding you, bu we are moving towards a surrounding music mindset, with 5.1 audio and relativly cheap high quality headphones.

Orchestral work could be a wonderful experience in headphones if the producers worked activly to create a carefully prepared, and well thought-out, soundstage. Listening to music performed on a live stage and in headphone with a technically constructed soundstage is two completly different experiences. They should not be mixed up. Just an opinion of course.

[4] The Social Media Folding

The Fold Diagram

The diagram above characterize the idea about folds and folding laid out by Gilles Deleuze in his books about Leibniz (Deleuze 1992) and Foucault (Deleuze 1988). Folds are Deleuze’s affirmative alternative to the traditional idea of interior/exterior: in subjectivity, architecture, art, science, politics and other perspectives on life and non-life. Folds are critique of and response to the western idea of a dualistic world.

To use subjectivity as an example, modern western people have an instinctive sense of a inner self looking out on the world. Deleuze’s theory of the fold says that the interior/exterior distinction is a construction. Researchers in cognitive neuroscience explain this self construction of self awareness as a part of the brain creating a story with the subject acting as a self-aware rational agency. In reality, most of our actions seems unconscious and are only available to the interpretative part of the brain after they happened. In analogy with cognitive neuroscience we could say that The Interpreter (Gazzaniga 2011) or The Rider (Haidt 2006) is folding the world to create a sense of self awareness.

To take a wider perspective, the figure of the fold can also be used to make a sense of how the digital technology assemblage has folded reality into a new dimension called the web, www, cyberspace, the Internet, the net etc. We constantly talk about the Internet as something other than reality. And still, it is reasonably clear for most people that the Internet is just an expression of corporeal reality with the same incorporeal dimensions such as language, history and the future.

The phenomena of social media is yet another technosocial folding. Producers and consumers of old media existed in a fold were media producers formed the inside and consumers formed the outside, and the other way around, depending on the perspective, i.e. inside the consumer fold or the producer fold. New media or social media can be viewed as a refolding where producers and consumers suddenly are situated in the same fold. Quite suddenly, and in relation to technological change, we (socius) are becoming the media, now called social media. From now on, we are coding ourselves and others as producers and consumers simultaneously.

References

Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. 1st ed. Univ Of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. 1st ed. Univ Of Minnesota Press.
Gazzaniga, Michael S. 2011. Whos in Charge Free Will and the Science of the Brain. Ecco.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2006. The Happiness Hypothesis.

[3] Smooth Space and the Social Media Hub

3 Smooth Space and the Social Media Hub

Social Media is a paradigmatic concept suggesting that almost everything in media connects to the technical hub of the Internet. The Internet is becomming meaningless as a concept to describe the complex space of person assemblages connected to the hub. Social media should be the preferable term to conceptually encompass the Internet, www, web 2.0 and traditional media.

All space is smooth by default, ie nomad, non-sedentary. Striated space was once about deterritorialization. Now, when most space on earth seems to be striated, we have to reterriatorialize some of the space. Since striation has become the norm, the line of flight is about deterritorialization.

This was what happend in 2004 when the concept web 2.0 became popular. The striated space of the intial Internet was deterritorialized and parts of it became smooth space.

[2] Twitter & Reciprocal Territories

2 Twitter and Reciprocal Territories

The mindmap above is a brainstorming draft as usual. I used it to fumigate the ideas lurking under the tapestry of sleeping brain cells. There are definitly a lot more to be written in the mindmap but the concept drawing most of my attention this time was reciprociality, and specifically in relation to Twitter. Reciprocal thinking – or non-thinking – is definitly important in most Twitter territories. The concept reciprocal altruism comes from from Robert Trivers and his research in evolutionary biology. It explains how a society can develop from an expectancy of If you scratch my back, I will scratch yours. This style of thinking is closely related to Game Theory and specifically the game called “tit for tat”.

Robert Trivers introduced the concept in the article The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism (1971). All social media is obviously driven of some kind of reciprociality, but somehow Twitter seems to be a candidate to stand out with its unspoken If you follow me, I follow you mentality and the politics of retweeting. It seems fair to say that one of the main content expressions in a Twitter territory is about reciprocal behaviour.

[1] Institutional Territories

1 Institutional Territories

I have been reading up (somewhat) on Foucault and the concept institution because it is somehow aligned with the methodology of territorialization-deterratorialization-reterratorialization. An institution is a kind of territory of a limitid size and function. Both territories and institutions are obviously Deleuzian assemblages with virtual/actual qualities.

A territory can be of any size. Institutions must reach a particular size to gain the power to be called Institution, but there is no definable border. Territories are somehow about power in undefined relations. Institutions are about power in the relation between the autonomous individual and a large group of humans generally related to the state or consumption society, with obvious exeptions as old social institutions as friendship and marriage. All institutions are territories, but all territories are not institutions. The concept institution seems valuable in a methodology of territorialization, since it specify an important kind of territories becoming increasingly important in social media. I will call them Institutional territories.

Institutional Territories are power driven, normalisation machines working to maintain a balance between the autonomous individual and the need of the institutions. The unspoken priority of an institutional territory is self-interest, self-power, which makes it nessecary for the individual to strive for deterritorialization – often related to individual freedom. So in in institutional territories, deterritorialization have the romantic air often surrounding the related concept lines of flight as expressed in social media.

Is Social Meda becoming an institutional territory, or is it already?